我已将修改后的伊利诺伊州SB 4113的大部分案文中包含在下方，该文件旨在建立一个反驳的推定，即对每个父母的平等育儿时间奖励是在离婚案件中的未成年子女（REN）的最佳利益。
多年来，我的公司代表着复杂的儿童监护人案件，并且在许多情况下，我父亲的客户被定以被授予他们孩子的初级保管。我在多年来一直努力为我的父亲提供父亲的竞争环境，一些人面临着离婚案件中的虚假指控，虚假行动和其他挑战。这些案件可以是战斗，但通过正确的策略和管理，可以在这些情况下达成正确的决定。因此，我为妇女而战，在自己的监护案件中，一些面临自恋丈夫的父母的虚假指控。我的目标一直是为我的男性和女性客户制定战略，以打击父母的异化，虚假指控，以及为我的客户和儿童的真正最佳利益提供服务。
因此，对于SB 4113，问题成为此法例，以及本身的立法，为父母创建该级别的播放领域吗？我注意到，许多更多的声音律师协会都反对这项法案，我可以说我讨论过的一些法官，这不赞成账单。但是，这种情况的想法有很大的青睐，特别是在长期以来，男女们受到了众多的法律制度，这是一个不满足的法律制度。 SB 4113将创建该基础，以便法院需要对父母两项时间的推定50/50分配我希望SB 4113可能经历一些可能使其通过更卑鄙的修订。我注意到，50/50的推定是一个令人满意的想法，但在许多情况下，许多法官和临床医生不相信在大多数情况下和大多数家庭都有50/50的分配是合适的。均衡的时间是有益的，父母彼此靠近彼此，父母都分享积极的育儿特征，工作时间表可以容纳50/50的时间，孩子们的年龄和情况有利于分支时间，而无数的其他因素有益于真正的共享育儿环境。我相信，可以编写一个分享的育儿账单，这可能会更加密集，更详细，更丰富地，可能会使富裕的共享育儿账单成为段落的真正可能性。
我相信和支持共享育儿，在那些对父母和孩子们来说是正确的事情。在存在负育儿的情况下，父母的异化和/或家庭暴力或精神病理学，我也相信脱掉这些病理和限制伤害孩子和另一家父母的父母。
SB 4113现在搬到全房房屋以供考虑，有趣的是，看看它是否以其现状为签名的签名者。
AMENDMENT TO HOUSE BILL 4113
|
| 2 |
|
AMENDMENT NO. ______. Amend House Bill 4113 by replacing |
| 3 |
|
line 18 on page 7 through line 11 on page 11 with the |
| 4 |
|
following: |
| 5 |
|
"(750 ILCS 5/602.7) |
| 6 |
|
Sec. 602.7. Allocation of parental responsibilities: |
| 7 |
|
parenting time. |
| 8 |
|
(a) Allocation of parenting time. Best interests. The court |
| 9 |
|
shall allocate parenting time according to the child's best |
| 10 |
|
interests. Unless the parents present a mutually agreed written |
| 11 |
|
parenting plan and that plan is approved by the court, the |
| 12 |
|
court shall allocate parenting time. There is a rebuttable |
| 13 |
|
presumption that it is in the child's best interests to award |
| 14 |
|
equal time to each parent. In determining the child's best |
| 15 |
|
interests for purposes of allocating parenting time, the court |
| 16 |
|
shall consider all relevant factors, including, without |
| 17 |
|
limitation, the following: |
|
|
|
|
10000HB4113HAM002 |
– 2 – |
LRB100 14598 HEP 38212 A |
|
|
| 1 |
|
(1) the wishes of each parent seeking parenting time; |
| 2 |
|
(2) the wishes of the child, taking into account the |
| 3 |
|
child's maturity and ability to express reasoned and |
| 4 |
|
independent preferences as to parenting time; |
| 5 |
|
(3) the amount of time each parent spent performing |
| 6 |
|
caretaking functions with respect to the child in the 24 |
| 7 |
|
months preceding the filing of any petition for allocation |
| 8 |
|
of parental responsibilities or, if the child is under 2 |
| 9 |
|
years of age, since the child's birth; |
| 10 |
|
(4) any prior agreement or course of conduct between |
| 11 |
|
the parents relating to caretaking functions with respect |
| 12 |
|
to the child; |
| 13 |
|
(5) the interaction and interrelationship of the child |
| 14 |
|
with his or her parents and siblings and with any other |
| 15 |
|
person who may significantly affect the child's best |
| 16 |
|
interests; |
| 17 |
|
(6) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, |
| 18 |
|
和 community; |
| 19 |
|
(7) the mental and physical health of all individuals |
| 20 |
|
involved; |
| 21 |
|
(8) the child's needs; |
| 22 |
|
(9) the distance between the parents' residences, the |
| 23 |
|
cost and difficulty of transporting the child, each |
| 24 |
|
parent's and the child's daily schedules, and the ability |
| 25 |
|
of the parents to cooperate in the arrangement; |
| 26 |
|
(10) whether a restriction on parenting time is |
|
|
|
|
10000HB4113HAM002 |
– 3 – |
LRB100 14598 HEP 38212 A |
|
|
| 1 |
|
appropriate; |
| 2 |
|
(11) the physical violence or threat of physical |
| 3 |
|
violence by the child's parent directed against the child |
| 4 |
|
or other member of the child's household; |
| 5 |
|
(12) the willingness and ability of each parent to |
| 6 |
|
place the needs of the child ahead of his or her own needs; |
| 7 |
|
(13) the willingness and ability of each parent to |
| 8 |
|
facilitate and encourage a close and continuing |
| 9 |
|
relationship between the other parent and the child; |
| 10 |
|
(14) the occurrence of abuse against the child or other |
| 11 |
|
member of the child's household; |
| 12 |
|
(15) whether one of the parents is a convicted sex |
| 13 |
|
offender or lives with a convicted sex offender and, if so, |
| 14 |
|
the exact nature of the offense and what if any treatment |
| 15 |
|
the offender has successfully participated in; the parties |
| 16 |
|
are entitled to a hearing on the issues raised in this |
| 17 |
|
paragraph (15); |
| 18 |
|
(16) the terms of a parent's military family-care plan |
| 19 |
|
that a parent must complete before deployment if a parent |
| 20 |
|
is a member of the United States Armed Forces who is being |
| 21 |
|
deployed; and |
| 22 |
|
(17) any other factor that the court expressly finds to |
| 23 |
|
be relevant. |
| 24 |
|
If the court deviates from the presumption contained in |
| 25 |
|
this subsection, the court shall issue a written decision |
| 26 |
|
stating its specific findings of fact and conclusions of law in |
|
|
|
|
10000HB4113HAM002 |
– 4 – |
LRB100 14598 HEP 38212 A |
|
|
| 1 |
|
support of the deviation from the presumption. |
| 2 |
|
(b) Restrictions Allocation of parenting time. Unless the |
| 3 |
|
parents present a mutually agreed written parenting plan and |
| 4 |
|
that plan is approved by the court, the court shall allocate |
| 5 |
|
parenting time. It is presumed both parents are fit and the |
| 6 |
|
court shall not place any restrictions on parenting time as |
| 7 |
|
defined in Section 600 and described in Section 603.10, unless |
| 8 |
|
it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a parent's |
| 9 |
|
exercise of parenting time would seriously endanger the child's |
| 10 |
|
physical, mental, moral, or emotional health. If the court |
| 11 |
|
deviates from the presumption contained in this subsection, the |
| 12 |
|
court shall issue a written decision stating its specific |
| 13 |
|
findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of the |
| 14 |
|
deviation from the presumption |
| 15 |
|
In determining the child's best interests for purposes of |
| 16 |
|
allocating parenting time, the court shall consider all |
| 17 |
|
relevant factors, including, without limitation, the |
| 18 |
|
following: |
| 19 |
|
(1) the wishes of each parent seeking parenting time; |
| 20 |
|
(2) the wishes of the child, taking into account the |
| 21 |
|
child's maturity and ability to express reasoned and |
| 22 |
|
independent preferences as to parenting time; |
| 23 |
|
(3) the amount of time each parent spent performing |
| 24 |
|
caretaking functions with respect to the child in the 24 |
| 25 |
|
months preceding the filing of any petition for allocation |
| 26 |
|
of parental responsibilities or, if the child is under 2 |
|
|
|
|
10000HB4113HAM002 |
– 5 – |
LRB100 14598 HEP 38212 A |
|
|
| 1 |
|
years of age, since the child's birth; |
| 2 |
|
(4) any prior agreement or course of conduct between |
| 3 |
|
the parents relating to caretaking functions with respect |
| 4 |
|
to the child; |
| 5 |
|
(5) the interaction and interrelationship of the child |
| 6 |
|
with his or her parents and siblings and with any other |
| 7 |
|
person who may significantly affect the child's best |
| 8 |
|
interests; |
| 9 |
|
(6) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, |
| 10 |
|
和 community; |
| 11 |
|
(7) the mental and physical health of all individuals |
| 12 |
|
involved; |
| 13 |
|
(8) the child's needs; |
| 14 |
|
(9) the distance between the parents' residences, the |
| 15 |
|
cost and difficulty of transporting the child, each |
| 16 |
|
parent's and the child's daily schedules, and the ability |
| 17 |
|
of the parents to cooperate in the arrangement; |
| 18 |
|
(10) whether a restriction on parenting time is |
| 19 |
|
appropriate; |
| 20 |
|
(11) the physical violence or threat of physical |
| 21 |
|
violence by the child's parent directed against the child |
| 22 |
|
or other member of the child's household; |
| 23 |
|
(12) the willingness and ability of each parent to |
| 24 |
|
place the needs of the child ahead of his or her own needs; |
| 25 |
|
(13) the willingness and ability of each parent to |
| 26 |
|
facilitate and encourage a close and continuing |
|
|
|
|
10000HB4113HAM002 |
– 6 – |
LRB100 14598 HEP 38212 A |
|
|
| 1 |
|
relationship between the other parent and the child; |
| 2 |
|
(14) the occurrence of abuse against the child or other |
| 3 |
|
member of the child's household; |
| 4 |
|
(15) whether one of the parents is a convicted sex |
| 5 |
|
offender or lives with a convicted sex offender and, if so, |
| 6 |
|
the exact nature of the offense and what if any treatment |
| 7 |
|
the offender has successfully participated in; the parties |
| 8 |
|
are entitled to a hearing on the issues raised in this |
| 9 |
|
paragraph (15); |
| 10 |
|
(16) the terms of a parent's military family-care plan |
| 11 |
|
that a parent must complete before deployment if a parent |
| 12 |
|
is a member of the United States Armed Forces who is being |
| 13 |
|
deployed; and |
| 14 |
|
(17) any other factor that the court expressly finds to |
| 15 |
|
be relevant. |
| 16 |
|
(c) In allocating parenting time, the court shall not |
| 17 |
|
consider conduct of a parent that does not affect that parent's |
| 18 |
|
relationship to the child. |
| 19 |
|
|
| 14 |
|
on page 16, by replacing lines 19 and 20 with the following: |
| 15 |
|
"(a) After a hearing, if the court finds by a preponderance |
| 16 |
|
of the evidence that a parent"; and |
| 17 |
|
on page 18, lines 8 and 9, by changing "clear and convincing a |
| 18 |
|
preponderance of the" to "a preponderance of the". |
伊利诺伊州离婚律师博客
